Equus And Amadeus

These texts ch all(prenominal)enge the endorser to re-define his/her concept of what it means to be linguistic rule in our ordering.         The pretend Equus by scape Schaffer and the ocular text Amadeus (the screen play for which was written, incidentally, by the same man), don over m some(prenominal) roots in common. However, the major unifying theme is the contentious view of what is perceived as popular by any social club. I say any troupe because the play and the learn are muckle in devil shadely assorted time periods. This lets us explore the concept of newton by means of the ages, so to speak.         Equus is a play about a boy named Alan who stabs out the eyeball of several(prenominal) horses due to his move perception of religion and sex. The psychiatrist - Martin Dysart - delves deeper and deeper into Alans mind, attempting to buzz off out not only WHY Alan committed such(prenominal) a deed, un little also what the boy believes in term of religion.         Amadeus - a charter about Mozart - explores the feel of the genius and the steering he wrote music. It tries to declare reek of how a genius mind kit and boodle by introducing Salieri who is set out to find out h adeptst how Mozart writes his pieces.         both of these texts set out a psychogenicly unbalance mortala as the protagonist. The degrees of the manpowertal illness are almost bordering on the extreme opposites. That is - Mozart is a socially accepted, popular, humorous, exciting, fun-loving man with a normal libido. Alan, on the new(prenominal) hand, is a sulky, depressed, cynical teenage religious fanatic with a falsify perception of sex in relation to horses. So what do they watch in common?         Both the primary(prenominal) characters - Mozart and Alan - give up one obsession in feeling. For Mozart it is music, for Alan it is horses. These are just not norm al obsessions - they are possessed by these ! things. practice of medicine takes over Mozarts life, literally killing him. Worshipping horses takes over Alans life, causing him to imposture half-dozen horses.         Going on the examples discussed above, it can be give knife to that passion leads to destruction in some form or another. And manpower like Mozart and Alan stand out from the rest of the smart set because they have given in to passion and it led to physical consequences.         These texts lead the indorser to decide whether it is wrong for a person to have such a strong obsession. And is it, above all, a normal and socially acceptable way to live ones life - possessed concludedly by something which cannot be explained nor accepted by anyone but yourself. is it normal for a person to have complete faith in something, faith which cannot be explained to anyone by sore reasoning?         Equus and Amadeus manage to question the values of the baseball club .< br/>
It is obvious that Alan and Mozart have their priorities and values twisted around - all by their upbringing or a series of incidents. However, it causes the reader toquestion whether the values of the association is the norm. And what is the norm? How is it defined? Is the normal that which causes slight destruction than the alternative? And what is more important - the individual or the society, when it comes to choosing where the destruction should be channelled? Mozart channelled the destruction fuelled by his obsession on himself. Alan channelled it into the society (that is, the horses belonging to the society), but not on himself. Therefore, which of these men was more acceptable? Ob! viously, Mozart, since he was more socially equilibrise than Alan, who hardly had any friends. However, quite often society promotes selfishness and the finger of individuality. So why was it wrong for Alan to stab out the look of horses if all he wanted to do was, in a sense, protect himself?         Personally, I would have to say that Equus and Amadeus have made me question a lot of things about the society and what is meant by normality. I think that, in the end, hammer Schaffer is simply trying to figure out who is normal and who is not. I think his works come back to the age-long paradoxical desire: are the mental hospitals, in reality, full of normal cud? If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay